Articles Tagged with “assisted reproductive law”

when-the-bough-breaks.jpgLast week, one of our staff members went to the movies and saw a trailer for a film called “When the Bough Breaks.” The movie features a married young professional couple unable to conceive naturally, so they decide to pursue surrogacy. They match with a seemingly perfect surrogate and she becomes pregnant with their child. As her pregnancy progresses, she develops an obsession with the intended father, and attempts to seduce him. When he dismisses her advances, she becomes psychotic and threatens to hurt the baby. According to the official synopsis, “the couple becomes caught up in [the surrogate’s] deadly game and must fight to regain control of their future before it’s too late.” Sony Pictures Entertainment is marketing the film as a thriller, using the tagline “Find out how #ItAllWentWrong.” Our staff member was not only appalled by the entire plotline, but also by disturbing scenes such as one where the surrogate dangles a knife over her belly after the intended father rebuffs her advances.

While such plots make for juicy storylines that may attract moviegoers, these depictions of surrogacy are inaccurate and misleading. Surrogacy is normally an overwhelmingly positive experience for both the intended parents and the gestational surrogate. Gestational surrogates are scrupulously screened by agencies. Many fertility clinics require that the intended parents and the surrogate complete a mental health evaluation prior to starting the surrogate’s medications. The parties must usually stipulate in their surrogacy agreement that they have undergone mental health evaluations and that they have discussed the potential psychological risks with a mental health professional. In the unlikely event that something goes wrong, it hardly resembles the plot in “When the Bough Breaks.” More realistic issues that may arise can include disagreements during the contract negotiation phase, pregnancy complications requiring bed rest, or insurance-related uncertainties. Agencies, clinics, physicians, attorneys, social workers, and other professionals work tirelessly to ensure that gestational surrogacy arrangements are based on the underlying principle of good faith. While the emergence of problems in a surrogacy is not inconceivable, the level depicted in “When the Bough Breaks” is extreme and sensationalized.

To those who enjoy thrillers and plan to “find out how #ItAllWentWrong” when the film hits theaters in September, we encourage you to keep in mind that this movie does not accurately represent surrogacy. For an excellent and thought-provoking read on another recent misrepresentation of surrogacy, this time on television, check out this blog post by attorney Rich Vaughn from the International Fertility Law Group.

embryo.jpgLast summer, we blogged about Kamakahi v. ASRM et al., the egg donor price-fixing class action lawsuit. Two former egg donors initiated the federal claim in 2011. The lawsuit alleged that price guidelines followed by fertility clinics violated antitrust laws by limiting the amount of compensation women can receive for their eggs. The guidelines stated that in regard to compensation for egg donors, justification is required for sums of $5,000 or more, and total payments exceeding $10,000 are “not appropriate.” The plaintiffs further contended that by agreeing to the guidelines created by the American Society for Reproductive Medicine (“ASRM”) and the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology (“SART”), the fertility industry conspired to restrain trade and fix prices.

Earlier this year, the parties reached a settlement after four years of litigation.The terms of the settlement include the removal of the language stating that “[t]otal payments to donors in excess of $5,000 require justification and sums above $10,000 are not appropriate.”The ASRM has also agreed not to make any future dollar amount recommendations for donor compensation. Although the settlement did not result in a monetary award for the class members, they are permitted to file an individual lawsuit to recover damages. The ASRM will also provide $5,000 to each of the four named plaintiffs (Lindsay Kamakahi, Chelsea Kimmel, Justine Levy, and Kristin Wells).

The attorneys of Harden Jackson Law are devoted to servicing clients in all areas of family law, including divorce, custody, child support, property division, paternity, post-divorce modifications, prenuptial and postnuptial agreements, simple wills, adoption, surrogacy, and other areas of reproductive law. For more information, please contact us at 317.569.0770 or www.hardenjacksonlaw.com.

Infertility.jpgOne in eight couples experiences infertility in the United States. While infertility awareness is growing, people facing infertility may encounter insensitive and hurtful comments (though not always intentional). A brief refresher on infertility etiquette is a helpful way to minimize these uncomfortable experiences. Read on for some Dos and Don’ts when talking to friends and loved ones experiencing infertility.


Do

Listen. Show them that you care by listening to them if they choose to open up about their infertility struggle. Lend an ear and remain attentive as they share their experience with you.

baby hand.jpgWhile a family building journey brings much excitement, it’s also important to address the difficult but necessary subject of estate planning. Estate planning documents can prevent the additional stress and disorientation should tragedy afflict the intended parents or the gestational surrogate.

It is highly recommended that the intended parents establish or amend their existing estate planning documents to reflect the child that the gestational surrogate is gestating. This should involve designating a guardian for the child, unequivocally stating the child’s legal parentage, and establishing financial support for the child in the event of the intended parents’ death. Additionally, if the intended parens have stored cryopreserved embryos or other genetic material, their disposition should be addressed in the estate planning documents (absent a separate disposition agreement).

The gestational surrogate should also establish or amend her existing estate planning documents to reflect the child. This typically involves stating that the child is not biologically related to her and does not inherit from her, and designating the intended parents as guardians of the child in the event of her death. It’s also important for the gestational surrogate to execute a document (such as a power of attorney) expressing her desires regarding life support and selecting a designee to carry out her wishes should she become incapacitated during the pregnancy.

egg donation.jpgKamakahi v. ASRM et al., a putative class action lawsuit filed in 2011, has been making headlines lately. Two former egg donors brought the federal lawsuit, alleging that price guidelines followed by fertility clinics violate antitrust laws by limiting the amount of compensation women can receive for their eggs. The plaintiffs further contend that by agreeing to the guidelines created by the American Society for Reproductive Medicine (ASRM) and the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology (SART), the fertility industry conspired to restrain trade and fix prices. The guidelines presently state that in regard to compensation for egg donors, “sums of $5,000 or more require justification,” and “sums above $10,000 are not appropriate.” The Northern District of California permitted the case to move forward earlier this year, and it will likely reach the trial stage next year. Below is a summary of the general arguments supporting each side of the lawsuit.

Arguments Supporting Kamakahi

• The pricing guidelines set by the ASRM and the SART, where 90% of the U.S.’s fertility clinics are members, constitute illegal price-fixing. Women are deprived of a free market to compensate them for donating their eggs, permitting fertility clinics to generate large profits for themselves.

france+flag.jpg
The Cour de cassation, France’s highest court, ruled last week to legally recognize children born abroad through surrogacy. The decision stems from two cases where the respective fathers sought birth certificates for their children born to surrogates in Russia.

The ruling legally connects the children to their parents, and registers them as French citizens. France did not previously recognize the children’s foreign birth certificates, and they were unable to obtain identification cards, French passports, state health care, and other services to which French citizens are entitled. Children born to surrogates abroad are now granted the same legal rights as French-born children. Although surrogacy remains illegal in France, this holding remedies the situation of children stuck in legal limbo as a result of France’s failure to grant them legal recognition.

The court’s decision follows several recent European rulings that have been favorable to surrogacy. In December 2014, Germany’s highest court ordered Germany to legally recognize children born through surrogacy. The European Court of Human Rights issued two similar rulings in June 2014. Stay tuned to our blog for more updates in the evolving field of surrogacy law.

616726_handshake.jpgSurrogacy laws vary by state. Indiana law currently holds that all surrogacy contracts are void and unenforceable. However, Indiana law does not prohibit the act of surrogacy itself, and recent court rulings have been favorable to surrogacy. Indiana has strong case law on the establishment of parentage in the biological parents of a child born through gestational surrogacy (In re Paternity and Maternity of Infant R., 922 N.E.2d 59 (Ind. Ct. App. 2010)). Despite Indiana’s antiquated statute, surrogacy agreements are still completed in Indiana for the following reasons:

1. Experienced assisted reproductive professionals require surrogacy agreements. Most physicians and fertility clinics do not permit parties to enter into a surrogacy arrangement without a contract. Mental health specialists and reproductive law attorneys often have a similar requirement.

2. Surrogacy agreements delineate the parties’ expectations, liabilities, and responsibilities. Surrogacy contracts provide stability by ensuring that everyone is on the same page. These agreements contain carefully drafted provisions that address every aspect of the surrogacy, from confidentiality to the payment schedule. They also foster accountability among the parties. Additionally, surrogacy contracts diminish the potential for disputes, as parties can refer to the agreement for guidance in the event of an uncertainty.

embryo.jpgThe Sofia Vergara/Nick Loeb frozen embryo dispute has taken the nation by storm. The battle over their frozen embryos begs the question: are embryos persons or property? This blog post will provide a brief overview of the legal status of embryos, as the answer varies throughout the United States.

Courts and state legislatures have categorized embryos into four distinct groups:

1. Persons

Thumbnail image for Financial Tips.jpg
First, it’s important to consider the costs involved in surrogacy. Intended Parents typically cover the following expenses:

Medical Procedures: This is likely the most expensive facet of surrogacy. Surrogacy includes in-vitro fertilization (IVF) or artificial insemination, as well as the medication costs that accompany these procedures. Additional expenses include tests, monitoring, and pregnancy care (if the embryo transfer is successful).

Mental Health Expenses: The Intended Parents and the Gestational Surrogate typically undergo mental health assessments prior to entering into a surrogacy arrangement. Many gestational surrogacy agreements also provide the Gestational Surrogate the option to attend several counseling sessions throughout her participation in the surrogacy arrangement.

bond_with_baby_during_pregnancy.jpgHave you ever wondered what the difference is between gestational surrogacy and traditional surrogacy? The surrogate’s genetic contribution is the distinguishing factor between the two classifications. In traditional surrogacy arrangements, the surrogate contributes her egg and is therefore genetically related to the child she is carrying. The intended father supplies the sperm. In contrast, the surrogate has no genetic link to the child in a gestational surrogacy arrangement.

Gestational surrogacy is the newer of the two categories and was first reported in 1985. Gestational surrogacy involves the surrogate mother carrying an embryo created from the genetic material of one or both of the intended parents. If an intended parent is unable to supply their genetic material, they will utilize donor egg or sperm. Gestational surrogacy is considered legally safer than traditional surrogacy, because the child has no biological relation to the gestational surrogate. Gestational surrogacy also poses fewer hurdles to the establishment of legal parentage due to the biological connection between the intended parents and the child.

The shift from traditional surrogacy towards gestational surrogacy was propelled by the Baby M case decided by the New Jersey Supreme Court in 1986, where two families “f[ought] over a baby who belonged to both of them.” In Baby M., the surrogate refused to return the child, born through traditional surrogacy, to the biological father and his wife. The embryo was created using the biological father’s sperm and the surrogate’s egg. The intended parents sued to relinquish the surrogate’s parental rights and sought to establish legal parentage in the biological father’s wife. However, the New Jersey court ruled that the surrogate was the child’s legal mother. The use of traditional surrogacy declined following the outcome of Baby M. Courts’ inclination to establish legal parentage due to the genetic link and the accessibility of reproductive technology popularized gestational surrogacy.

Contact Information