Recently in Assisted Reproductive Law Category

What happens to your frozen embryos? Inheritance and Wills

April 3, 2014

fortune.jpgAn important issue surrounding frozen embryos has recently emerged into spotlight: What happens when parents die and leave no will or instructions for the fertility clinic regarding the disposition of their frozen embryos? A Master in Chancery appointed by a Dallas probate court has recommended that a two year old boy, whose parents were murdered, inherit their eleven frozen embryos when he turns eighteen. John Robertson, professor of law at the University of Texas at Austin, addresses the groundbreaking nature of this case in the Harvard Law Petrie-Flom Center Blog by stating that "there are no Texas or United States cases involving inheritance of frozen embryos when both parties have died and left no instructions with the clinic or in a will."

This issue introduces the question of whether frozen embryos are considered "property" in these types of scenarios. Robertson informs us that the Master found that Texas courts have not held them to be property, nor have they found them to be worthless. He reports that as a result, the Master assigned them an implicit value under Texas's intestacy statute since they can be the subject of an enforceable contract. If they embryos are not designated as "property," the Master found that the boy can still retain an "ownership interest" that would give him "dispositional control" over the eleven embryos.

Robertson introduces the complex issues that arise from giving a two year old orphan dispositional control over his future siblings when he turns eighteen, including the "oddity" of asking someone so young to "decide whether to continue paying storage fees, discard [the embryos], or donate to others or to research."

This case illustrates the various complications that ensue when parents who create embryos fail to leave directions for what should occur to their frozen embryos if they both die. Difficult, ethically questionable inquiries such as whether frozen embryos are considered property or what an eighteen year old should do when he receives control over his potential siblings are avoidable. This begs the question as to whether it is the clinic's obligation to mandate that all intended parents create a will prior to creating embryos instructions regarding the embryos' disposition in the event of their death.

photo credit: quinn.anya via photopin cc

Ethical and Legal Dilemmas of Post-humous reproduction

March 14, 2014

ART.jpgAssisted Reproduction Technology has created many alternatives for families with infertility to build their families. However, it has also created many legal issues due to the slow nature of the law to keep up with this rapidly evolving technology. One extremely complex area of this law is dealing with frozen reproductive material that is in storage at a sperm or egg bank after a loved one dies. Examples of legal issues include the legitimacy of the child born, inheritance rights of the child, psychosocial/psychological issues, grieving period prior to deciding when and how to use reproductive material, and the "shelf-life" of the preserved reproductive material.

Recently, a woman in the UK won a court battle to stop her deceased husband's frozen sperm from being destroyed. The husband had sperm frozen before starting cancer treatment and signed paperwork saying his wife could use the sperm after his death. After the husband died, he could no longer update his consent for the sperm to stay in storage so officials sought to destroy it by April 2015. The woman won the right to extend the preservation of the sperm until 2023. The woman has not decided when and if she will use the sperm to have a child.

This story is not that uncommon. There are plenty of situations when individual are faced with the diagnosis of a terminal disease, or another illness that threatens their ability to reproduce so they make plans to have their reproductive material cryopreserved for future use by their significant other. The legal question remains: Did the donor explicitly give consent, simply by donating their material, for future use? What if it is written in a last will and testament?

The law previously addressed these issues by enacting paternity statutes to prevent subsequent children from emerging and claiming that they are entitled to some inheritance money indefinitely. However, now that technology has advanced, these paternity statutes don't necessarily apply. So how does the law handle it in these emerging situations? Indiana allows claims of paternity for up to 11 months after the death of the parent. That would mean the widow(er) would be required to get pregnant within 2 months of the death or the child would lose rights to any inheritance or benefits, as well as possibly losing the ability to establish their heritage through paternity or maternity which could potentially cause psychological issues for the child. However, without these statutes any heirs would not be able to collect their rightful share until the estate is closed. These are examples of the ongoing ethical and legal dilemmas surrounding cryopreservation and posthumous use of reproductive material.

Remember, these suggestions are not meant to be legal advice. You should consult a family law attorney to discuss the specifics of your situation.

Should you have a legal matter regarding Assisted Reproductive Technology, contact an experience attorney. Call Harden Jackson Law at 317.569.0770.

photo credit: WaDaNaBe via photopin cc

Indiana Court of Appeals: Surrogate can not petition to disestablish maternity

July 16, 2013

By Michele Jackson

Thumbnail image for MLJ headshot.jpgA recent Court of Appeals ruling in Indiana has created some confusion on the Indiana Court's view on establishing parentage in some surrogacy cases. The court ruled that a married woman who acted as a surrogate for another couple cannot petition to disestablish her maternity because it would cause the child to be "declared a child without a mother". The issue arose In the Matter of the Paternity and Maternity of Infant T.

For the past two years in Indiana, I have been successful in petitioning paternity and maternity for an intended father and intended mother based on the case In re Paternity & Maternity of Infant R. While this case was specific to biological parents, it did not prohibit the use of the process when using egg donor or sperm donor and thus I was continually successful in using the same process. However, based upon the recent case, this option may not be possible. It appears from a strict interpretation of this case, if a donor is used, then the gestational surrogate will be the legal mother until an adoption takes place, as the state will not allow for a child to not have a legal mother. While I believe that the courts will continue to accept the petitions for paternity and maternity, even after this decision, I want to make it clear there is a more significant legal risk for intended parents using donors.

I am unclear why the Court was petitioned in this manner regarding a Petition for Paternity and Disestablishment of Maternity. I, personally, do not petition this way. In addition, taking this case up on appeal was likely premature for Indiana.

While I feel this case will definitely affect single males and same sex males wanting to remove gestational surrogates from birth certificates, I am not confident that it will be applied in the court as our firm petitions in a different way than this case. If it is applied, then the parent that is not genetically related would have to adopt the child.

The other possible implication that could result from this case is that pre-birth orders may not be as readily available. Previously, the courts with whom I have worked would establish paternity and maternity through stipulation and affidavits. I am left wondering if the court will now require DNA testing for establishing maternity or paternity (depending on the donor material used).

The case states that the intended father could establish biological parentage through stipulation and affidavits pre-birth, but that to file for maternity, stipulation and affidavits were not sufficient and it needed to be proven by clear and convincing evidence ("The indirect disestablishment of maternity requires a putative mother to petition the court for the establishment of maternity and to prove her maternity by clear and convincing evidence, not simply by affidavit or stipulation" whereas for the father the Court states, "...on questions of paternity our supreme court has made clear that a joint stipulation between the birth mother and the putative father 'constitute[s] sufficient evidence to rebut the presumption.'").

I am disappointed that this case was filed in this manner and then appealed in this manner. I feel that this is a set-back for surrogacy in Indiana when donors are used. However, Infant R. still provides significant precedence for a quick and streamlined way to establish parentage for intended parents that are biologically related to the child. This seems to be stable and solid law in Indiana.

At this time, we are pursuing Indiana legislature to determine if we can create more favorable laws for surrogacy. Prior to this appeal case, it did not seem timely to make this request as surrogacy was quite flexible and we have been able to obtain parentage, even in donor cases.

Do I Need A Lawyer If I Am Using Donor Egg, Donor Sperm or Adopted Embryos?

June 19, 2013

673264_85522744.jpgTwenty years ago there weren't many options other than adoption, sperm donation, and traditional surrogacy for couples who had issues with infertility. Today, there are numerous alternatives to choose from when making a decision to build a family. Since the law is having a difficult time keeping up with the emerging technology, it is important for these families to understand the legal implications when dealing with the different options with assisted reproduction technology.

Donor eggs can be used and fertilized with the intended father's sperm through in-vitro fertilization (IVF) if the intended mother is incapable of utilizing her eggs. The resulting embryo is then transferred into the intended mother (or surrogate) and carried to term.
Embryo adoption occurs when intended parents make use of a cryo-preserved embryo (already fertilized) that was donated by another couple. The donated embryo(s) may be transferred to the intended mother or to a gestational carrier.

In sperm donation, an intended mother (or surrogate if applicable) is inseminated with donor sperm. This can be done through intrauterine insemination (IUI) or in-vitro fertilization (IVF).

State laws governing egg donation and embryo transfer vary. For instance, some specify that a woman who has donated an egg or a couple who has donated an embryo are not the legal parents of any resulting child. Other states recognize the woman who gives birth to a child conceived through ART as that child's legal mother. Similar to egg donors, some states have laws that specify that a sperm donor is not the legal parent of a child conceived through artificial insemination. In other states, the law explicitly recognizes the husband of the intended mother as the child's legal father. In cases where state law does not specify parentage, the donor(s) and the intended parents should draw up a written agreement, in which the donor relinquishes any parental rights.

In Indiana, most fertility doctors will require a legal contract to address the responsibilities of both the Intended/Recipient Parent (IP) and the donor. The contracts provide protection for all parties by detailing compensation and responsibilities and help clarify expectations. As for the legal parentage, Indiana has a statute that explicitly states that the woman that gives birth to the child(ren) is presumed the legal mother. If the woman giving birth is married, her husband is presumed to be the legal father of the child(ren). However, Indiana's case law is favorable to the Intended Parents becoming the legal parents of their biological child(ren) and has been granting pre-birth orders to deal with the statutes presumption of birth mother being legal mother. In the event that a pre-birth order is not obtained, a post-birth order and modification of the birth certificate can be done to name the appropriate parents. Because of Indiana's presumption it is important to speak with an experienced lawyer that deals with this type of law to obtain a court order specifying the intended parents as the legal and biological parents.

For the reason stated above, it is best to obtain a lawyer when you are using donor material because there is much more legal risk in obtaining parentage of the resulting child since there is not a genetic relationship between one of the parents. There may also be some risk to the donor or intended parents that are using a donor. The donor and/or intended parents may try to make contact in the future against the wishes of the other party. Also, their family members may try to pursue a relationship with the child, or the child with the donor's family. It is also a risk that the donor has other offspring in the same geographical location and there is a risk for incest between offspring. These are just a few examples that should be considered when using donor material. In sum, there are many aspects that need to be considered and a lawyer that specializes in reproductive law can address those with you.

If you have questions about egg or sperm donation or any other assisted reproductive technology procedures, Harden Jackson Law is here to help.

Assisted Reproductive Technology - terms you should know

June 13, 2013

1161454_67402672.jpgAssisted reproductive technology (ART) is a general term referring to the third party techniques or medical methods used to achieve pregnancy without insemination by sexual intercourse. The technology is used for a variety of reasons, but the ultimate goal is for individuals and couples to have a child when they otherwise would not been able to do so. The term is used in medical and legal fields and encompasses a number of different subjects and processes.

For any prospective parent, the jargon can be overwhelming, being inundated with unusual abbreviations and complex terminology. To be able to better understand the legal implications and responsibilities in donor agreements and surrogacy contracts, it is important to have a basic understanding of some of the more common terms and procedures. Below are common terms and their definitions to help prospective parents navigate through the ART journey.

  • ASSISTED REPRODUCTIVE TECHNOLOGY (ART) - A group of treatment methods used to improve fertility, which involves collecting the eggs and putting them in direct contact with sperm.
  • COMPENSATION - Payment of any valuable consideration for services in excess of reasonable medical and ancillary costs
  • CONCEPTION - The fertilization of an egg by sperm that leads to the creation of a baby.
  • CONGENITAL - Conditions present from birth, either hereditary or environmental.
  • CRYOPRESERVATION - The process of freezing tissues or cells and then storing them in liquid nitrogen at very low temperatures. This process is used to store sperm, embryos, and unfertilized eggs. They are stored in small vials or straws that can last for decades.
  • DONOR - An individual who contributes a gamete or gametes for the purpose of in vitro fertilization or implantation in another.
  • DONOR INSEMINATION (DI) - A type of artificial insemination using sperm not from the male partner or husband.
  • DONOR SPERM - Semen specimens donated and used in an ART procedure.
  • EGG DONATION - Process in which eggs from a fertile woman are donated to an infertile woman for use in an ART procedure.
  • EGG RETRIEVAL - A procedure used to collect eggs from a woman's follicles for use in IVF, usually performed with ultrasound-directed needle aspiration during IVF.
  • EMBRYO - A term that describes the time from fertilization of the egg until the first few weeks of pregnancy.
  • EMBRYO FREEZING - See Cyropreservation
  • EMBRYO TRANSFER - Placing an embryo into a woman's uterus or into the fallopian tube after IVF.
  • FERTILITY CLINIC - A program of fertility specialists offering a range of fertility services, usually including ART.
  • FERTILITY DRUGS - A group of drugs given to women to improve fertility. Fertility drugs are also used to treat some men with male factor infertility.
  • FERTILITY SPECIALIST - A doctor who specializes in the diagnosis and treatment of infertility.
  • FERTILIZATION - Penetration of the egg by the sperm cell.
  • FETAL REDUCTION - A technique that reduces the number of fetuses in a multifetal pregnancy to reduce the risks of multiple pregnancy.
  • FETUS - A term used to describe human in utero development, from the period of time when the embryo is fully formed at around 8 weeks, until birth.
  • GAMETE - Either a sperm or an egg.
  • GESTATION - The medical term for pregnancy

Harden Jackson Law can assist you with consultation, preparation, negotiation and review of any consents, contracts, arrangements or parentage documents related to ART processes and surrogacy.

Struggling with Infertility?

April 23, 2013

Thumbnail image for 1252251_maternity_photos.jpgThe National Infertility Association will recognize National Infertility Awareness Week®, April 21 through April 27, joining millions of women and men fighting the disease of infertility, professionals and other thought leaders to promote greater awareness about infertility. For National Infertility Awareness Week®, Harden Jackson will focus our activity on educating both professionals and families on issues relating to infertility. Harden Jackson is dedicated to assisting couple and individuals achieve the dream of building a family. We provide sound legal advice for an oftentimes confusing and emotional journey. There are quite a few different ways to bring a child into your life. While certainly not comprehensive, the following information can help you understand more about the different ways you can build your family.

Surrogacy - Surrogacy is an assisted reproductive technology which provides an option for individuals or couples who are unable to conceive or carry a child. Advances in reproductive methods including in vitro fertilization (IVF) provide alternatives for creation and implantation of an embryo for pregnancy. A surrogate agrees to become pregnant for the purpose of giving the child to another individual or couple (the "intended parent(s)" or "IPs"). Parties to a surrogate arrangement typically enter into a surrogacy contract (or surrogacy agreement) which details the terms of the process including costs.

Egg or Sperm Donation - Surrogacy can also involve egg and/or sperm donations. If you are using an egg or sperm donor for your surrogacy process, most agencies or REI doctors will require a legal contract to address the responsibilities of both the Intended/Recipient Parent(s) (IPs) and the donor. The contracts provide protection for all parties by detailing compensation and responsibilities and help clarify expectations.

Embryo Adoption - Embryo adoption provides a new adoption choice! Rather than adopting a child who has already emerged from her mother's womb, embryo adoption allows the adopting family to begin the adoption journey nine months earlier with pregnancy and childbirth. Embryo Adoption provides the Intended Parents, who are unable to naturally or medically conceive, the opportunity to give birth to a child (this could also include using a Surrogate).

In all of the above situations there are legal implications and responsibilities. For more information on the legal services we provide to help you build your family, contact Harden Jackson Law.

Surrogacy in Indiana

April 11, 2013

We are continually reminded that many prospective parents and Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART) professionals believe surrogacy can't happen in Indiana. Indiana has strong case law on the establishment of parentage in biological parents through surrogacy. Additionally, our firm has implemented the same process when using donor egg and/or sperm. Our firm files for parentage in many surrogacy cases per year and has not had any denied to date. It IS happening in Indiana, but not without some legal risks.
8-10-09 249.jpgThere remain old surrogacy statutes that indicate surrogacy is against public policy. These statutes were written under the idea of traditional surrogacy (In a traditional surrogacy, the surrogate becomes pregnant with her own biological child, which has been conceived with the intended biological father or donor sperm) only and did not contemplate gestational surrogacy (In a gestational surrogacy, the surrogate has no genetic link to the child/ren she is carrying; rather, the egg is provided either by the intended mother or an egg donor). There have not been any gestational surrogacy contract disputes in the State of Indiana for judicial publication. We do have an antiquated surrogacy law, but in practice judges are following the more current case law and there has been support shown by the judiciary for surrogacy evidenced by their signing of the necessary documents.
Indiana has a strong position that biological parents of a child born through gestational surrogacy will be given parental rights. There are legal risks that would need to be considered when using a surrogate in Indiana. Also remember, that we represent nearly 50 clients each year in these matters and have not encountered any negative responses from the Court and have been successful in establishing parentage. We have had wonderful success for many families using surrogates in the State of Indiana.

Remember, this information is not meant to be legal advice. You should consult a family law attorney to discuss the specifics of your situation.

If you have questions about surrogacy, egg/sperm donor contracts or other assisted reproductive technology, contact Harden Jackson Law.

Surrogacy - Traditional? Gestational? What does it all mean?!

April 2, 2013

Surrogacy is a family building option for those who want a child and have not had success with other assisted reproductive technology (ART) treatments. There are two types of surrogacy -- traditional and gestational -- that are practiced today.

In traditional surrogacy, the surrogate is both the egg donor and surrogate, and is therefore genetically related to the child. The surrogate carries an embryo that was created with her own egg and the sperm of the intended father who, with the intended mother, will obtain legal and physical custody of the child. Traditional surrogacy can be accomplished either by intrauterine insemination (IUI) or by in vitro fertilization (IVF). The Traditional Surrogate is inseminated with the Father's or Donor's sperm monthly at ovulation until pregnancy occurs.

In gestational surrogacy, the surrogate gives birth to a baby created with an egg and sperm from the "intended parents," or the embryo can be created from a donor egg and/or donor sperm. The majority of surrogates today are gestational carriers and have no genetic relationship to the child born from the arrangement. IVF is used to fertilize the eggs in a laboratory. If the fertilization is successful, a fertility doctor transfers some or all of the resulting embryos (usually two or three) into to the surrogate's uterus. After delivery, the gestational surrogate immediately surrenders the baby to the intended parent(s).

Many different people can use surrogacy as an option to build their families, including couples and single women who have had multiple failed pregnancies, those who are unable or have difficulty conceiving, those who are unable to carry a fetus to term or same-sex male couples who want a child with a genetic link to one of the partners.

With that said, we are continually reminded that many people still believe surrogacy can't happen in Indiana. Surrogacy can and does happen in Indiana! Stay tuned for our upcoming blog on surrogacy and the law in Indiana.

Surrogate offered $10,000 to abort baby

March 12, 2013

From a recent CNN story, when a Connecticut couple learned their surrogate mother was carrying a fetus with developmental disabilities, they offered her $10,000 to have an abortion.
Thumbnail image for 8-10-09-193.jpg
In August 2011, Crystal Kelley was carrying the child of another couple. When Kelley was approximately 20 weeks pregnant, an ultrasound showed that the baby had a cleft lip and palate, a cyst in the brain, and a complex heart abnormality. The parents offered Kelley $10,000 to abort, stating "Given the ultrasound findings, (the parents) feel that the interventions required to manage (the baby's medical problems) are overwhelming for an infant, and that it is a more humane option to consider pregnancy termination,". Kelley declined. The couple and the surrogate had legal contracts and part of that contract included a clause that she'd agree to abort if the fetus had a severe abnormality. However, the contract did not define what constitutes such an abnormality.

The parents then stated that they planned to exercise their legal right to take custody of their child -- and then immediately after birth surrender her to the state of Connecticut. She would become a ward of the state. Kelley could not bear to send the child into the foster care system, especially when she had so many medical problems.
Kelley fled Connecticut for Michigan, where she, not the genetic parents, would be considered the baby's legal mother. Michigan is a state that does not recognize surrogacy contracts, and so the baby legally belongs to the woman who's carrying the baby.

In Ann Arbor, she gave birth to a child with severe medical conditions. The legal dispute over the child continued. The case became even more complicated when the parents filed legal papers that included a stunning admission: the wife was not the baby's genetic mother -- they'd used an anonymous egg donor.

Three weeks after the baby was born, both sides finally reached agreement. Kelley had found an adoptive family that had experience with special needs children and placed the child with them. The father agreed to give up his paternal rights as long as he and his wife could keep in touch with the adoptive family about the baby's health. The outcome could have been very different had Kelley stayed in Connecticut.

People are often confused about the surrogacy laws in Indiana. In Indiana, a court process must be completed to establish parental rights but biological parents prevail in having rights.

Those considering surrogacy should keep in mind that a gestational surrogate has the right to make medical decisions (like abortion) while carrying a child for the biological parents.It is important for all parents pursuing a typical pregnancy, surrogacy or adoption that it is not to have a perfect child. There are no guarantees in life and there are no guarantees with any pregnancy or child.

If you have questions about surrogacy or assisted reproductive law, please contact Harden Jackson Law.

Making a difference for a family struggling with infertility

February 28, 2013

In 2012 I joined the board of directors for a local nonprofit called the Indiana Collaboration for Families with Infertility (ICFI). This organization, founded by a local family and 100% volunteer ran, provides support, resources, and education for families struggling with infertility.
This week ICFI is holding our annual $5 for Families campaign to raise crucial funds to help continue our services. For a donation of only $5 you can help make a difference in the lives of many local families. 100% of the proceeds from this campaign go directly towards ICFI's support services.

You can make your donation online by visiting:

I appreciate your time and consideration and thank you in advance for your generosity!

Michele Jackson

Artificial insemination not an excuse for Indiana man to not pay child support

February 12, 2013

Attorney Michele Jackson, who specializes her legal practice in Adoption and Assisted Reproductive Law weighs in on the legal pitfalls in assisted reproduction in Indiana.
In a recent Indiana Court of Appeals case (Engelking v. Engelking) the court was charged with determining if father should pay child support as the parent of two children conceived through artificial insemination during his marriage to Mother. In this case, the father claimed that his six and nine year old children, born while he was married to their mother, were not children of the marriage because they were born via artificial insemination without his knowledge. The mother claims that father did have knowledge of the artificial insemination and father supported both children and treated them as if they were his biological children. The trial court and Court of Appeal both provided findings that supported Mother's claim. Father was ordered to pay child support.
Assisted reproduction used during a marriage to two intending parents should result in parents that have parent rights and obligations. What if the one of the parents does not consent to the assisted reproduction? In most circumstances of the parties being married, both parents would still gain parental rights and obligations. However, in assisted reproduction using the sperm of a donor or the egg of a donor, the donor is often not a legal parent and has not parental rights or obligations and that was the intent of all parties. Be careful though! It is important that all known donors have contracts that specifically indicate intent of the parties. In addition, anonymous donors may also want contracts as well. There are many reasons for the contracts beyond parental rights. There are issues of liabilities and finances that may need to be addressed between the two parties (the donor and the intended parent(s)).
For more information on Assisted Reproductive Technology and the laws in Indiana, contact Michele Jackson at Harden Jackson Law @ 317.569.0770


February 7, 2013

Press Contact:
Leah Potter
11450 N. Meridian, Carmel, IN 46032
Phone: 317.569.0770
Web site:

For Immediate Release


CARMEL, IN - February 7th, 2013 -. Attorney Michele Jackson, who chairs the Harden Jackson Law's Adoption and Reproductive Law Practice Group, received the Indianapolis Business Journal's Forty Under 40 award. The award recognizes professionals younger than 40 years of age for service in their jobs and in the community.

Michele Jackson chairs the firm's Adoption and Reproductive Law Practice Group and focuses her practice in domestic and international adoptions as well as reproductive law matters. Jackson is also the founding Executive Director of MLJ Adoptions, Inc.

In addition to her professional contributions, Jackson also founded the Global Orphan Foundation (formerly the Fatherless Foundation), a not-for-profit organization which raises funds and provides supplies to orphanages world-wide.

Harden Jackson, LLC is a Carmel law firm providing personalized service with a responsive and compassionate approach. As effective and experienced litigators, the attorneys work with clients to develop strategies for negotiating settlements, while always preparing for litigation if necessary. The practice assists clients in all areas of family law, adoption and reproductive law matters. For more information, please contact Leah Potter at 317.569.0770 or .

# # # #

Maryland Woman Wins Custody Of Frozen Embryos

January 15, 2013

This story below was reported by Greenbelt Patch in Maryland:

'A Maryland woman has gained custody of nine frozen embryos she created with her ex-husband, according to an attorney working on the case.

Godlove Mbah of Greenbelt and his ex-wife, Honorine Anong of Upper Marlboro, were divorced in May 2012, but disputes have continued over the couple's stored embryos and a 3-year-old daughter previously conceived from one their embryos.

Though Mbah asked to have them destroyed, according to The Daily Record, Maryland Circuit Court Judge John Paul Davey signed an order in December giving sole custody of the embryos to Anong--a first-of-its-kind ruling in Maryland.

Davey found that the commercial contract the couple signed at the Shady Grove Fertility Clinic in July 2008--prior to the procedure--was valid, according to attorneys involved in the case.

That contract said the embryos would be given to Anong in case of a separation. Nataly Mendocilla, Mbah's attorney, argued that her client's signature wasn't notarized.

Although Mbah lost the dispute over the embryos, he was awarded sole custody of the couple's 3-year-old daughter in April after her mother was found "unfit to have custody", Mendocilla said.

However, Mbah's attorney argued that giving Anong custody of the embryos is taking away her client's rights to choose whether or not to father another child.

Anong wants to have more children, Mendocilla said, and now Mbah is obligated to be a parent against his will "with his ex-wife who has lost custody of the one child they do have because of neglect."

Mendocilla believes her client should have equal rights in that decision. Clark contends that her client cannot have children by any other means because her fallopian tubes were removed to help her conceive through in vitro fertilization.

The frozen embryos are the only way Anong can have more children, Clark said.

But Mendocilla argued that it is a matter of public policy.

"If a woman can clearly have an abortion of a known viable fetus, why can we not apply those same laws to a father who does not want to be a parent?" she asked.

Currently, Anong has the right to implant the embryos, although Mbah's attorney has filed a stay to prevent any action pending an appeal.'

Attorney Michele Jackson, who practices Assisted Reproductive Law in Indiana notes that, "Assisted Reproductive medical practitioners may be seeking legal advice for these agreements up front and assume they are doing the right thing. However, it is important these facilities recognize they must have appropriate legal advice regarding the content and effect of clinic consent forms from practitioners who are versed in Assisted Reproductive consents."

Michele Jackson discussing Assisted Reproductive Law and Surrogacy on WISH-TV

October 2, 2012

Michele Jackson discussing Surrogacy and Assisted Reproductive Law and the laws pertaining to Indiana on Indy Style.

Family Law and Assisted Reproductive Technology

World First Ruling on defining Conception

August 28, 2012

The world’s first ruling on conception has been made by an Australian judge in Brisbane regarding when conception begins. The judge ruled conception only occurred when a fertilized egg was implanted in a woman’s womb – that is, the moment of pregnancy – rather than at the moment the egg was fertilized. The origin of the case deals with an embryo that was created years before the surrogacy arrangement, then frozen and not implanted in the uterus until months after the written arrangement was settled.

This ruling would have no impact on birth through natural conception; however it has a major impact on surrogate parents, and those with children who were born through in-vitro fertilization in Queensland, Australia. Judge Clare's ruling will stop current and future disputes in parenting matters where couples are seeking to have a child through a surrogacy arrangement.

The surrogacy legislation in Australia currently states that when the birth mother (surrogate) assigns parenting control (parenthood) to the surrogate parent/s or intended parents - control has to be signed over before a child is actually "conceived". This leads to why this legislation is so important; it is intended to help people in genuine need of surrogacy and may have embryos from prior infertility treatments.